vivo x300 antutu score: v11 vs v10 Performance Guide

The vivo X300 has two listed AnTuTu results: 2,346,352 in AnTuTu v10 and 3,416,530 in AnTuTu v11. These numbers represent the performance profile recorded for the device, but they should not be treated as a direct generation-to-generation comparison because benchmark versions use different scoring systems and workloads.

For a fair comparison, place phones tested on AnTuTu v10 beside other v10 results, and do the same for v11. A higher v11 score does not automatically mean the phone is roughly 45% faster than its v10 result. The difference is primarily connected to the benchmark revision, scoring model, and test behavior.

The AnTuTu result is useful as a broad reference because it combines several hardware areas. However, it cannot fully predict camera processing, modem behavior, battery endurance, thermal comfort, or app-specific performance.

The most reliable approach is to use AnTuTu as one part of a wider assessment. The Geekbench 6 result offers a processor-oriented reference, while the 3DMark result gives additional context for graphics workloads. Together, these figures provide a more balanced view than a single score.

The vivo X300 pairs a MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset with a 3 nm manufacturing process. That platform is supported by fast UFS 4.1 storage and up to 16GB of RAM, giving the phone a strong foundation for demanding applications, multitasking, and high-resolution media tasks.

The available memory configurations matter when comparing listings. The phone is specified with 12GB or 16GB of RAM, while storage options range from 256GB to 1TB. A benchmark result can vary between configurations because memory capacity, storage behavior, software state, temperature, and background activity can all affect testing.

The 120Hz LTPO AMOLED display does not directly create a higher AnTuTu score, but it affects how responsive the phone feels during everyday use. Likewise, RAM capacity may improve multitasking without changing every component of a combined benchmark by the same amount.

For the published hardware details, see the vivo X300 full specifications. The specification page also lists the phone’s Android 16 software, OriginOS 6, stereo speakers, and battery configurations.

Benchmark scores are most useful when they answer a specific question. If you want to know whether the vivo X300 belongs in a high-performance class, the AnTuTu results provide a clear indication. If you want to understand sustained gaming or graphics behavior, a 3DMark result and thermal observations are more relevant.

The listed 3,416,530 AnTuTu v11 score is the newest benchmark figure in the available data. It should be labeled with its version whenever it appears in a comparison, article, video, or shopping discussion.

When repeating a benchmark, keep the conditions as consistent as possible:

• Use the same benchmark version on every device.
• Install the same benchmark release and allow it to finish updating.
• Charge the phone sufficiently before testing.
• Close unnecessary background apps.
• Avoid comparing a cool first run with a warm device after extended use.
• Record the RAM and storage configuration.
• Note the operating system and performance mode.

This method makes comparisons easier to audit. It also prevents a common mistake: using an impressive number without explaining the benchmark version or test conditions.

The vivo X300 is specified with a 6,040 mAh silicon-carbon battery in the global configuration and a 5,360 mAh battery for EU markets. Charging support is listed as 90W wired, 40W wireless, and reverse wired charging.

Battery capacity does not determine an AnTuTu score by itself. Instead, it helps frame how the phone may handle demanding sessions. High-performance tasks can increase power consumption, so battery size, charging speed, display settings, network activity, and thermal management all matter when evaluating practical use.

The battery difference between regional versions is important for readers comparing imported and local models. A review or benchmark result should identify the market version whenever possible, especially when battery endurance is part of the discussion.

The phone also includes a 6.31-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. That combination can support a smooth interface while allowing the display system to adjust refresh behavior in compatible situations. Actual endurance will still depend on brightness, network conditions, camera use, gaming, streaming, and background applications.

For everyday use, the benchmark results suggest a performance-focused phone, but a score alone cannot describe camera quality, network reliability, charging behavior, or long-term comfort. Those areas require separate testing.

Use the following reference table when documenting or comparing the phone. Keeping the values separated by benchmark version avoids misleading rankings and makes future updates easier to verify.

A useful comparison entry should include four details: the phone model, benchmark version, score, and test configuration. Without those labels, readers may interpret two numbers as directly comparable when they are not.

The GSM Arena specification reference lists the benchmark results together with the phone’s chipset, memory, storage, display, camera, and battery specifications. Use that reference when checking the baseline figures presented in this guide.